Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 13, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2022-1098Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JONTE ROBINSON et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 22-1098 (TJK) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER For many years, the Bureau of Prisons, or BOP, assessed kidney function differently for black inmates than for non-black inmates. Plaintiffs—one former and one current black inmate whose kidneys were assessed under that method—sue BOP because they say that policy caused them medical injuries and resulted in denial of their compassionate-release requests. They claim that BOP’s race-based…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API