Legal Opinion

Planning Board of Hamilton Township v. New Jersey Pinelands Commission

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 9, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

PETRELLA, J.A.D.

These consolidated appeals involve challenges by the planning boards of the Townships of Egg Harbor (Egg Harbor) and Hamilton (Hamilton) to the action of the New Jersey Pinelands Commission (Commission) denying them standing and an opportunity to be heard or to object to development approvals granted by the Commission’s staff in their respective communities. We hold that the planning boards have standing under the statute and that notice and hearings are required. We reverse and remand for public hearings with respect to the development…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Avant v. CliffordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. Brewer v. PorchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  4. Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Crescent Park Tenants Ass'n v. Realty Equities Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1971

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Application of John madin/lordland Development InternationalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. IN THE MATTER OF THE NEW JERSEY PINELANDS COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF NEW JERSEY NATURAL GAS'S APPLICATION (NO. 2014-0045.001) FOR THE INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF THE SOUTHERN RELIABILITY LINK PROJECTION AND THE DENIAL OF PINELANDS PRESERVATION ALLIANCE'S REQUEST FOR AN ADJUDICATORY HEARING (NEW JERSEY PINELANDS COMMISSION) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API