Legal Opinion

Chaddock v. Chaddock

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, William F., J.

Plaintiff and defendant were married at Rochester, N. Y., January 27, 1927, after a courtship of two *901months. They cohabited following the marriage for two weeks, and then separated. Following the separation the defendant was committed to the St. Lawrence State Hospital for the Insane, located at Ogdensburg, N. Y. After his commitment, and on April 15, 1927, the plaintiff instituted this action, under the provisions of section 1137 of the Civil Practice Act, to annul said marriage on the ground that defendant was a lunatic on the occasion of said marriage. Henry E. Dodd,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Costello v. . CostelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Williams v. . HaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Deyo v. . MorssNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Brown v. . LeighNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Hoadley v. HoadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HearnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  2. Croce v. CroceNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. District Court Sixth Judicial DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Becker v. BeckerNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Manse Builders, Inc. v. NorthrupNew York Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API