Legal Opinion

Fort Howard Paper Company v. Gulf States Paper Corporation

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 18, 1967No. Patent Appeal 7797PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 146 USPQ 593, dismissing appellant’s opposition to appellee’s application to register the trademark “E-Z NAPS,” serial No. 149,844; filed July 26, 1962, for facial tissue, toilet tissue, paper napkins, and paper towels.

The sole issue is likelihood of confusion, mistake, or deception within the meaning of section 2(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d). Opposer is the prior user and owner of registrations of “handinap” and “HANDINAPS,” Reg. Nos. 616,224 and 616,225 of Nov. 15, 1955, for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. E. L. Bruce Company v. American Termicide Company, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  2. The Magnavox Company v. Multivox Corporation of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fort Howard Paper Company v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  2. S C M Corporation v. Royal McBee CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  3. S C M Corporation v. Royal McBee CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API