Legal Opinion

Hieber v. Buchanan

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1947No. 15929Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION ROE REHEARING.

The defendant in error in his motion for rehearing makes a number of contentions to show that the court overlooked the record in the case, and it is strongly urged that the court’s judgment is based on proceedings (the distress and dispossessory warrants) which were not pending before the trial court, and it is urged that there is no sufficient assignment of error.

As shown by the statement of facts and the motion for rehearing, the distress warrant and dispossessory warrant procured by *836the receiver against Hieber in the Civil Court of Fulton County were with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burns v. HaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Glover v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Beck v. KahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. Georgia Power Co. v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. Petty v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API