Legal Opinion

Kling v. Kimball Pump Co., Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 17, 1931No. Docket No. 7794PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Respondent moved to dismiss the appeal from the judgment entered in the court below upon the ground that appellants did not file their proposed bill of exceptions or make service thereof within the period prescribed by law. The record shows that after the entry of judgment plaintiffs duly presented their motion for new trial, which motion was denied on June 26, 1930. It does not appear that the defendant ever gave notice in writing of the order denying said motion for a new trial, or that writ ten notice thereof has been waived in writing or by oral stipulation made in open court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Griffin v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Sterling Corporation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Savage v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Neusted v. SkernswellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Dr. Miles California Co. v. BronstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Ertman v. BlumenthalAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API