Neusted v. Skernswell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The defendant, Joseph Skernswell, has appealed from an order of the trial court terminating proceedings on appeal in the above entitled action. On the 26th day of May, 1941, the trial court entered an decree in a partition proceeding in favor of the plaintiff. In that judgment it appointed a referee to state the account between the parties. It also appointed a receiver, made an allowance of $750 attorney fees in behalf of the plaintiff’s attorney, and awarded costs in the sum of $239.52 *367in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant made a motion for a new trial. That motion was denied on July 10,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Griffin v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Attkisson v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Benson v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Savage v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Kling v. Kimball Pump Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ertman v. BlumenthalAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1945