Legal Opinion

Smith v. Snow

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 15, 2002No. 2001-CA-001887-MRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION McANULTY, Judge:

The Russell Circuit Court entered summary judgment in this case in favor of appellees, Marvin Snow, Maxine Bruner, Karen Isbell, and Yvonne Morris. The court found that the residuary bequest in the holographic will of Jean Gebhardt to establish a foundation failed because it did not identify the purposes of the devise or the beneficiaries with sufficient clarity. Appellants, Betty L. Smith and John J. Avent, are executors of the estate of Jean Gebhardt and appeal this decision. We affirm.

The residuary clause in Jean Gebhardt’s will stated as follows:

Sixth

I hereby…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Paintsville Hospital Co. v. RoseKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Spalding v. St. Joseph's Industrial SchoolCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  4. Citizens Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. Bernheim FoundationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  5. Myers v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tennessee Farmers Life Reassurance Co. v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API