Legal Opinion

Fuller v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1956No. 1 Div. 704PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of sodomy, and was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of two years.

Appellant was not represented by present counsel in the trial court.

There was no request for the affirmative charge, no motion to exclude the evidence, nor was there a motion for a new trial. Therefore, the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is not presented for review.

The record discloses only two rulings of the court adverse to appellant.

In the first instance, the State’s objection was sustained to this question: “Q. I will ask you if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Munson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Crump v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  3. Alexander v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Goulden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  5. Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API