Legal Opinion

Crump v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1947No. 8 Div. 523PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Judge.

This appellant was indicted for and by a jury found guilty of forgery in the second degree.

The appellant filed demurrers to the indictment, which were overruled by the court. The indictment was substantially in form prescribed by Form 64, Section 259, Title 15, Code of Alabama 1940, except that it contained the phrase “Knowing the same to be so altered or forged” immediately following the note which had been substantially set out. Such phrase did not render the indictment defective, and should be considered merely as surplusage, possibly affecting the proof of the charge, but…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fuller v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Crump v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API