Legal Opinion

Boyles v. Mississippi State Oil & Gas Bd.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2001No. 1999-SA-01300-SCTPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

794 So.2d 149 (2001)

Sherman BOYLES, et al.

v.

MISSISSIPPI STATE OIL & GAS BOARD, Murphy Oil USA, Fina Oil & Chemical Company, Vintage Petroleum, Inc., Union Pacific Resources, Exxon, Mobil, Amoco Corporation And Marathon Oil Company, Successor to TXO Production.

No. 1999-SA-01300-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

February 1, 2001.

Rehearing Denied September 13, 2001.

Stuart H. Smith, James R. Cox, Attorneys for Appellants.

Tim Waycaster, Edwin S. Gault, Jeffery P. Reynolds, P.A., Jackson, Teri D. Gleason, Attorneys for Appellees.

Before BANKS, P.J., SMITH and COBB, JJ.

SMITH, Justice, for the Court:

¶…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. COM'N ON ENV. QUALITY v. Chickasaw County Bd. of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  4. McGowan v. Miss. State Oil & Gas Bd.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. MISSISSIPPI ST. TAX COM'N v. Mississippi-Alabama St. F.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. LaVereMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Neider v. FranklinMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Chevron USA, Inc. v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Green v. Cleary Water, Sewer & Fire Dist.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Dialysis Solutions, LLC v. Mississippi State Department of HealthMississippi Supreme Court · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API