Legal Opinion
Morris v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1983No. Civ. No. 22274PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
Real party in interest, G. Daniel Walker, is a state prison inmate who has instituted a civil proceeding in propria persona in superior court challenging aspects of the conditions of his confinement. The issue here is whether in the civil proceeding Walker’s pro se status entitles him *563to designate his wife as his legal representative under a Department of Corrections rule governing visitation and consultation of attorneys with inmates (Cal. Admin. Code, tit. 15, § 3175; all section references hereafter are to tit. 15, Cal. Admin. Code). We hold that he is not.
Walker is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Payne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re GrimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989