In Re Grimes
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, J.
Respondent, together with other inmates at the Humboldt County Jail, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, claiming that appellant violated his constitutional rights by replacing direct dial pay telephones in the jail with collect-only telephones. The essence of respondent’s complaint is that the public defender’s office and some private attorneys and other county offices refused to accept collect calls from jail inmates, thereby compromising his access to counsel and the courts.
After several hearings were conducted at which evidence was taken, including petitions,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Wantuch v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Bunch v. Coachella Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Estes v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Apollo v. GyaamiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.