(PC) Hall v. County of Fresno
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CURTIS HALL, 1:18-cv-01678-DAD-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S 13 vs. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL BE DENIED AND THIS CASE 14 COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., PROCEED WITH PLAINTIFF’S FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT CLAIM 15 Defendants. AGAINST DEFENDANT FRESNO COUNTY, THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS 16 AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO 17 STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 8.) 18 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 19 FOURTEEN (14) DAYS 20 21 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 Curtis Hall…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.