Legal Opinion
Padula v. U. S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1982No. Civ. H-82-92PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
BLUMENFELD, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Antonio and Guiseppina Sestina Di Sanzo Padula, bring this action challenging the District Director’s denial of their request for an extension of time in which to voluntarily depart from this country. Plaintiffs contend that the District Director abused his discretion in denying their request for an extension of time. The basis of this claim is that the plaintiffs’ children, both United States citizens, will either be deprived of their parents or forced to withdraw from school during the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wong Wing Hang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- William CAULFIELD Et Al., Appellants, v. the BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF NEW YORK Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Acosta v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Panagiotis Kladis v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Elian Bolanos v. Maurice F. Kiley, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, New York DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Emmanuel v. United States Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1984
- Lemos-Garcia v. WeissDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
- Bryan v. I.N.S.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- Carrete-Michel v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983