Legal Opinion
Emmanuel v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided February 15, 1984No. Civ. No. 1982/205PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Respondents, the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service et al. (hereafter “INS”) have moved this Court for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the District Director did not abuse his discretion in denying petitioners’ applications, and there are no genuine issues as to any material fact. For the reasons set forth herein, we grant respondents’ motion and deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus, declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, and to compel.
I…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ness v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Patricia A. Hollinger, Administratrix of the Estate of Germaine S. Hollinger, Deceased v. Wagner Mining Equipment Company, a Division of Paccar, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Wong Wing Hang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Acosta v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Domingo Bastidas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Motta v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- People v. CamposCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Villegas v. O'NEILLDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1986
- Duldulao v. RenoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1997
- Okechukwu v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.