Legal Opinion

Gooldy v. Hines

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 20, 1940No. 28808PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered against him in the trial court, and on November 25, 1938, he filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed and remanded, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Osborne v. OsborneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sprague, Co. v. One Pin Ball MacHine Styled" Nevada"Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Fore v. ForeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. City of Tulsa v. CockrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Cantwell v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. City of Hartshorne v. State ex rel. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API