Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Cockrell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 12, 1945No. 31473PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against it in the trial court, and on August 11, 1943, filed its brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P. 2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause may be reversed and remanded, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gooldy v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Winters v. WintersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API