Legal Opinion

Rome Industries, Inc. v. Intsel Southwest

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 6, 1984No. C14-84-153-CV, C14-84-323CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JUNELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from summary judgments granted Intsel Southwest (Int-sel/Appellee) against Rome Industries, Inc. d/b/a Reynolds Manufacturing Company of McAllen, Texas (Rome) and Texas American Bank (Bank) wherein Intsel sought enforcement of a post-judgment writ of garnishment against assets of its judgment debtor, Kelley Corporation. Both Rome and Bank are appellants. We reverse and remand.

On August 12, 1983, Fesa Corporation N.Y. and Kelley Industries, Ltd. (or Kelley Corporation) 1 , as Sellers, and Rome Industries, Inc., as Buyer, entered into a purchase…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beggs v. FiteTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Jack E. Fore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. Southwestern Drug Corp. v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Anderson & Clayton Co. v. EarnestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. First National Bank in Dallas v. Banco Longoria, S. A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Newsome v. Charter Bank Colonial, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  2. Daniels v. Pecan Valley Ranch, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
  3. Rowley v. Lake Area National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  4. Baytown State Bank v. Nimmons, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  5. Regenia Bechem v. Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC and Comerica Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API