Legal Opinion

Newsome v. Charter Bank Colonial

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided March 27, 1997No. 14-95-00455-CVPublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURPHY, Chief Justice.

This is a suit for damages arising out of a garnishment action. Earl and Gail Newsome (“the Newsomes”) appeal from a judgment in favor of Charter Bank Colonial, Formerly Known as Colonial National Bank (“the Bank”). The Newsomes sued the Bank for conversion, fraudulent transfer, and conspiracy alleging that the Bank violated a writ of garnishment by failing to impound funds in certain accounts held in the names of the judgment debtors and third-parties. A jury rendered a verdict in favor of the Bank on all but one of the claims. After disregarding the jury’s…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Bonded Financial Services, Inc., Debtor-Appellant v. European American BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Spencer v. Eagle Star Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Cropper v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Ellis County State Bank v. KeeverTexas Supreme Court · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Seureau v. ExxonMobil Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  2. Chiste v. Hotels.com L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Yazdchi v. Bank One, Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  4. Cone v. Fagadau Energy Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Lipshy Motorcars, Inc. v. Sovereign Associates, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API