People v. Munoz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
In a trial by jury defendant Munoz was found guilty of three offenses: (1) possession for sale of heroin in violation of section 11500.5 of the Health and Safety Code (count I), (2) possession for sale of seconal in violation of section 11911 of the Health and Safety Code (count II), and (3) possession for sale of an amphetamine in violation of section 11911 of the Health and Safety Code (count III). On October 19, 1971, his motion for a new trial was denied but the trial court reduced each offense to that of a lesser included offense, namely, the conviction as to count I to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re De La OCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Cadilla v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. JassoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. BouchardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. HakeemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Ghilotti)California Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. Superior Court (Bauman & Rose)California Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. ToscanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. PeoroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. Superior Court (Ghilotti)California Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.