Legal Opinion
People v. Superior Court (Bauman & Rose)
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 31, 1995No. B085710PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS (A. M.), P. J.
This purported appeal is brought by the Los Angeles District Attorney on behalf of the People from an order of the superior court sealing certain documents seized during a search of respondents’ law offices pursuant to a valid search warrant. The putative respondents are the law offices of Bauman & Rose, Lake and Levine and Donald Lake and Howard Levine, and Denise Breakman.
Preliminarily, we must address the issue of appealability. The district attorney urges us to deem respondents’ motions to seal the documents seized from their offices to constitute a special…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re De La OCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- BP Alaska Exploration, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- American Tobacco Co. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Gordon v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Paul L. Gabbert v. David Conn Carol Najera Leslie Zoeller Elliot OppenheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.