Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1996No. 63636-2PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

— After deciding to seek the death penalty for Richard M. Clark, the State did not serve the special notice on Clark or his counsel personally. Instead, relying on a long-standing agreement between the Snohomish County Prosecutor’s Office and the Public Defender Office for daily pickup of papers, the State left the notice in a designated box, and a Public Defender staff person picked it up, stamped it "received,” and delivered it to the defendant’s attorney. Although the notice was filed and received by defense counsel within the statutory time period, the Snohomish County Superior Court…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API