Legal Opinion

Kimiko Toma v. Utah Power & Light Company

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1961No. 9402Published

1Opinion of the Court

12 Utah 2d 278 (1961)

365 P.2d 788

KIMIKO TOMA, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF FRED R. SHOOK, JR., DECEASED, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT,

v.

UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT AND RESPONDENT.

No. 9402.

Supreme Court of Utah.

October 26, 1961.

Clyde C. Patterson and Robert V. Phillips, Ogden, for appellant.

Ray, Quinney & Nebeker, Marvin J. Bertoch, F. Gerald Irvine, Sidney G. Baucom, Salt Lake City, for respondent.

NELSON, District Judge.

In this action, the plaintiff, as administratrix of the Estate of Fred R. Shook, Jr., deceased, seeks judgment against the defendant for the death of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hayes v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Godfrey v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Houston Lighting & Power Company v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Lemos v. MaddenWyoming Supreme Court · 1921

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API