Legal Opinion

Yano v. Stott Briquet Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1924PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed June 3, 1924:

Rosenberry, J.

It is the contention of the defendant that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law in this: that he was traveling at a rate of fourteen to fifteen miles an hour on a city street in the night with lights so dimmed that he could not see more than fifteen or twenty feet ahead of his car. It appears that the night was dark and foggy. Sub. 2, sec. 1636 — 52a, Stats., provides:

“The minimum requirements for head lamps on any automobile or other similar motor vehicle, except motorcycles, while being driven upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lauson v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Johnson v. PrideauxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Pietsch v. McCarthyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Worden v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Yahnke v. LangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. HussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GillespieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Woodworth v. KalesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
  4. Morley v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Fannin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API