Smith v. Jordan
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County dissolving an attachment. Lucien Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
This is an appeal from an order dissolving plaintiff’s writ of attachment. The order was made and entered February 18, 1897. The proposed bill of exceptions, by which the appeal comes here, was served on defendant’s attorneys March 10, 1897, and was not presented to the judge or filed with the clerk until March 2M, at which time it was presented to the judge for settlement, no judgment having been rendered in the action. Defendant objected to the settlement on the ground that it was not prepared, proposed, served, or presented to the court or counsel within the time allowed by law.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Flagg v. PuterbaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Gumpel v. CastagnettoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- Oberlander v. Fixen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Louisiana Realty Co. v. City of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910