Legal Opinion

Dravo Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided February 14, 1995No. 4:CV94-3345PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*125MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KOPF, District Judge.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45, Morton Zuber and Zuber Corporation (hereinafter collectively “Zuber”) and Burlington Northern Railroad Company (“Railroad”) have moved (Filings 1 & 3) as non-parties to litigation in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama to quash various subpoenas issued under the authority of this court and served upon them by Dravo Corporation (“Dravo”).

I shall grant the substance of the motions finding that, in the absence of a carefully crafted protective order, which cannot under the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dravo Corporation v. Morton Zuber, Zuber Company, and Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. Rent Stabilization Ass'n of New York City, Inc. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. In Re Digital Equipment Corporation E. Joseph DeanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. Dravo Corp. v. ZuberDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1992
  5. Mann v. University of CincinnatiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mount Hope Church v. Bash Back!Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Builders Ass'n of Greater Chicago v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API