Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nokes v. Nokes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1976No. 76-59Published

1DissentCelebrezze, J.

Because I do not agree that retroactive application of R. C. 3109.01 violates Section 28, Article EE of the Ohio Constitution, I must respectfully dissent from the judgment rendered herein.

Section 28, Article II of the Ohio Constitution provides, in pertinent part: “The General Assembly shall have no power to pass retroactive laws * * V’

In Gregory v. Flowers (1972), 32 Ohio St. 2d 48, the court held that the prohibition contained in Section 28, *10Article II, applies only to laws affecting substantive rights.

Thus, the ultimate issue presented by this appeal is whether either the right to child…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gregory v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Shoaf v. ShoafSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Thiessen v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Board of Education v. Fulton County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API