Nokes v. Nokes
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentCelebrezze, J.
Because I do not agree that retroactive application of R. C. 3109.01 violates Section 28, Article EE of the Ohio Constitution, I must respectfully dissent from the judgment rendered herein.
Section 28, Article II of the Ohio Constitution provides, in pertinent part: “The General Assembly shall have no power to pass retroactive laws * * V’
In Gregory v. Flowers (1972), 32 Ohio St. 2d 48, the court held that the prohibition contained in Section 28, *10Article II, applies only to laws affecting substantive rights.
Thus, the ultimate issue presented by this appeal is whether either the right to child…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gregory v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Shoaf v. ShoafSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Thiessen v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1922
- Board of Education v. Fulton County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.