Legal Opinion

Kimberly & European Diamonds, Inc. v. Burbank

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided July 9, 1981No. C 81-0223-L(B)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BALLANTINE, District Judge.

The fact situation from which this action arises defies credulity.

Plaintiff is a wholesale dealer in diamonds located in Dallas, Texas. According to the evidence adduced at the hearing on plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, it is standard practice in the industry to send diamonds by registered mail to prospective purchasers. The stones are accompanied by a memorandum, the substance of which is that the consignee accepts the diamond at his or her risk for all hazards only for examination and inspection. The memorandum provides that the stone…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,861 Gerald Mansbach v. Prescott, Ball & TurbenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  2. Urban v. Lansing's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kimberly & European Diamonds, Inc. v. William F. Burbank, Edwin Neal, Adeline Bohmer, William F. BurbankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. Foley v. Production Credit Ass'n of Fourth DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API