Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 11, 2002No. 00-5595Published

1ConcurrenceRosen, District Judge

I fully concur with the Court’s ruling in this case. I wish only to add that at least two alternative constructions of Kentucky case law, in addition to the one adopted by the majority, would lead to precisely the same result. Under our diversity jurisdiction, where our role is narrowly limited to *499predicting what a state court would do if presented with the facts before us, I am reluctant to foreclose the possibility that the Kentucky courts might choose to follow a course different from the one selected by the majority.

As noted by the majority, the Kentucky Supreme Court’s decision in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Healthwise of Kentucky, Ltd. v. AnglinKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Kimberly & European Diamonds, Inc. v. William F. Burbank, Edwin Neal, Adeline Bohmer, William F. BurbankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. Employers Insurance of Wausau v. MartinezKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Kimberly & European Diamonds, Inc. v. BurbankDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API