Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brenden v. Anderson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1982No. 13530Published

1DissentFosheim, Chief Justice

The threshold question is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to enter judgment for appellees. It did not. This is an equitable action. However, there is no evidence in the record that findings were waived in the manner required by SDCL 15-6-52(b). This requires remanding the case with direction that the trial court enter findings, conclusions and judgment based thereon.

Harold and Edithe Brenden (appellees) and Marvin and Delores Anderson (appellants) were equal partners in the business known as B & B Mobile Homes at Water-town, South Dakota. In December 1978 appellants purchased…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Black v. GardnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Betts v. LetcherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Sioux City Boat Club v. MulhallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Heiser v. RodwaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Orr v. KneipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API