Legal Opinion

Gibb v. Hansen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 19, 1979No. 63236PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Justice.

Plaintiff Allan Banks Gibb, III, challenges by way of petition for writ of certio-rari the defendant district court’s judgment of contempt entered against him. We believe the court acted legally and annul the writ.

Gibb presents the following issues for our review:

1. Whether a person accused of contempt committed before the court is provided adequate procedural safeguards under chapter 665, The Code 1977, sufficient to comply with Iowa Constitution article I, sections 9, 10, and 11;

2. Whether the court acted illegally in punishing Gibb for contempt without advising him of…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. United States v. Leonard PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. Piemonte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. In Re Robert Reginald KilgoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gacke v. Pork Xtra, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. McNabb v. OsmundsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Lutz v. DarbyshireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. State v. Allan Banks Gibb IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. Atwood v. VilsackSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API