Kaiser v. Carolina Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
S'i'uices, Justice.
This equitable action for the reformation of a life insurance policy and recovery of double indemnity for accidental death was tried by the court without jury or reference and resulted in judgment for plaintiff, whence defendant’s appeal. The beneficiary was the mother of the insured. The latter procured the insurance in 1946 through his father who was then an agent of the insurer, afterward severing that connection to accept part-time employment with another life insurance company; he also farms. An’Air Force veteran pilot, the insured re-entered the service as a First…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- L.A. & Redondo R.R. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Baldwin v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- California Packing Corp. v. LarsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Dickenson County Bank v. Royal Exchange AssuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Jumper v. Queen Mab Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. United Investors Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Belin v. STIKELEATHERSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- George Ex Rel. Estate of George v. Empire Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Botts v. Shenandoah Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1954
- Schafer v. Maryland Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.