Legal Opinion

Belin v. STIKELEATHER

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 10, 1957No. 17364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

This action was brought by the buyer, Prince Belin, to preform a written contract for the sale of real estate and for specific enforcement of the contract as reformed. Joined as defendants were C. W. Stikeleather, the seller, Louise SalJenger, his grantee, and J. W. Wallace who acted as agent of the grantee in her dealings with the plaintiff. Stikeleather demurred to the complaint on the ground that as to him it failed to state a cause of action. From an order sustaining this demurrer, there has been no appeal. The case was then referred to the Master of Florence County who…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Speed v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  2. Singleton v. CuttinoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  3. Adams v. WillisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  4. Gowdy v. KelleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  5. Martin v. LaboonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sims v. TylerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Progressive Max Insurance v. Floating Caps, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  3. Shay v. AustinDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
  4. Shirey v. BishopCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API