Legal Opinion
Holland v. Robert Coal Company
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 17, 1997No. CIV. A. 93-2608(GK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan (“1992 Plan”) bring this action to recover premium payments allegedly owed by Defendants to the 1992 Plan under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefits Act of 1992 (“Coal Act”), 26 U.S.C. §§ 9701, et seq. (1989 & Supp. 1997). 1 The Coal Act requires coal operators to contribute to the 1992 Plan to provide health coverage to retired workers.
Defendants contend that the Coal Act does not apply to them or, in the alternative, that it is unconstitutional. (Defs.’ Mem. Summ. J. at…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anker Energy Corporation v. Consolidation Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Mary Helen Coal Corp. v. HudsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- Anker Energy Corp. v. Consolidation Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999