Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Cosby (In Re Cosby)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:
The issues at bench are: (1) whether an attorney’s fee of $200.00, incurred by a mortgagee to compensate said attorney for having filed a complaint seeking relief from an automatic stay as a result of the debtor’s default on post-petition mortgage payments is reasonable; (2) whether inspection costs incurred by said mortgagee in the amount of $40.00 as a result of the debtor’s said default is reasonable; and (3) whether the modification of a stay can be conditioned on the payment of such reasonable counsel fees and inspection costs. We conclude that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Meade Land and Development Co., Inc. Appeal of Eastgate Enterprises, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- In the Matter of Meade Land and Development Co., Inc., Bankrupt. Appeal of Eastgate Enterprises, Inc., CreditorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
3Cited by7 opinions
- Browning v. NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Jackson v. Boulevard Mortgage Co. (In Re Nickleberry)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re Danny Lopez-Soto and Marilyn Pujals De Lopez, Debtors. Superior Paint Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Danny Lopez-Soto and Marilyn Pujals De LopezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- In Re SchwartzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Browning v. NavarroDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.