Legal Opinion

Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Cosby (In Re Cosby)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 23, 1982No. 19-10240PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:

The issues at bench are: (1) whether an attorney’s fee of $200.00, incurred by a mortgagee to compensate said attorney for having filed a complaint seeking relief from an automatic stay as a result of the debtor’s default on post-petition mortgage payments is reasonable; (2) whether inspection costs incurred by said mortgagee in the amount of $40.00 as a result of the debtor’s said default is reasonable; and (3) whether the modification of a stay can be conditioned on the payment of such reasonable counsel fees and inspection costs. We conclude that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Meade Land and Development Co., Inc. Appeal of Eastgate Enterprises, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. In the Matter of Meade Land and Development Co., Inc., Bankrupt. Appeal of Eastgate Enterprises, Inc., CreditorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Browning v. NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Jackson v. Boulevard Mortgage Co. (In Re Nickleberry)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. In Re Danny Lopez-Soto and Marilyn Pujals De Lopez, Debtors. Superior Paint Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Danny Lopez-Soto and Marilyn Pujals De LopezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  4. In Re SchwartzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Browning v. NavarroDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API