Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Boulevard Mortgage Co. (In Re Nickleberry)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 14, 1987No. 19-11474PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION
The above-captioned four cases are decided together because they raise related questions about demands of Mortgagees for counsel fees (and certain items of costs) against their respective Mortgagor-Debtors in cases where the Debtors seek to cure mortgage arrearages in Chapter 13 Plans for the following categories of services performed by the Mortgagees’ counsel: (1) Pre-petition services in state court foreclosure proceedings; and (2) Post-petition services in the bankruptcy court.
We hold that, as to the first category of services, state…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- In Re Meade Land and Development Co., Inc. Appeal of Eastgate Enterprises, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- In Re Hudson Shipbuilders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Joseph F. Sanson Investment Co. v. 268 LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re SimpkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- In Re LewisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Taras v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corp. of America (In Re Taras)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- In Re FordUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- In Re CorbettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Cole v. Cenlar Federal Savings Bank (In Re Cole)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.