Legal Opinion

Weidner v. Friedman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1912PublishedCited by 11 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Hamilton County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari from the Court of Civil Appeals to the Supreme Court. — T. M. McConnell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

Bills, original, amended, and supplemental, filed against certain proprietors of disorderly houses and their inmates, and the owners of some of the houses wherein the illegal business is carried on, in Chattanooga, to suppress all of the houses as nuisances by permanent injunction and to perpetually enjoin the owners from leasing the houses for such unlawful purpose. These houses are located in what is known as the “red light district” of Chattanooga, covering parts of Florence and Helen streets, most of them adjoining each other, and all near together. The bill ivas filed by private citizens…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Madison v. Ducktown Sulphur, Copper & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Memphis St. Ry. Co. v. Rapid Transit Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Cummings-Landau Laundry MacHinery Co. v. KoplinIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Granberry v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Nashville Corp. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Wireless Specialty Apparatus Co. v. PriessMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API