Legal Opinion
Lederman v. Board of Education
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1949PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHearn, J.
This is an action for a permanent injunction and a judgment declaring unconstitutional chapter 360 of the Laws of 1949 (commonly known as the Feinberg Law), section 12-a of the Civil Service Law (as implemented by the Feinberg Law) and the regents’ rules and commissioner’s memorandum promulgated thereunder.
There are three motions before the court — one for a temporary injunction, another for leave to intervene as parties plaintiff and the third, by plaintiffs, for judgment on the pleadings. Since a decision on the third will dispose of all issues, the court will consider it first.
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Adler v. Board of Ed. of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Thompson v. WallinNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Matter of Hughes v. Bd. of Higher Educ., City of NyNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Weinstein v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Adler v. Board of Ed. of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.