Legal Opinion

United States v. Belinda Rose Hovsepian

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1971No. 26379Published

1Per curiam

Appellant Hovsepian appeals from her conviction upon two counts charging violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174 (concealment, transportation, and sale of heroin) and one count charging violation of 26 U.S. C. § 4705(a) (sale of heroin without an order form).

Appellant claims that the evidence against her was insufficient to sustain her conviction. She relies on our opinion in United States v. Camarillo (9th Cir. 1970) 431 F.2d 616 vacating the conviction of her eodefendant Camarillo. She argues that the evidence against her is not materially different from that held insufficient in Camarillo’s case.

Here,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Peter Tovar CamarilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API