Legal Opinion

United States v. Peter Tovar Camarillo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 17, 1970No. 25750PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERTBERG, Circuit Judge:

Following a jury trial, appellant Cam-arillo, together with co-defendants Paul Judd, Hovespian, and Sotelo were convicted on Counts Four, Five and Six of a six count indictment. Co-defendant Prince was acquitted.

Count Four charged a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174 on or about September 19, 1969, when the appellant and the other persons named in that count knowingly received, concealed, and facilitated the concealment and transportation of 648.-40 grams of heroin which they knew had been previously imported into the United States.

Count Five charged that appellant and his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  3. United States v. Ralph Garguilo and Joseph MacChiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. United States v. William RaglandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  5. Abel Chavez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. EppersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Rene Delgado BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Benjamin E. SamaniegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Belinda Rose HovsepianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API