Legal Opinion
Finley v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 26, 2007No. Civil Action 06-1838 (SRC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHESLER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), by Defendants Dun & Bradstreet Corp. and the Dun & Bradstreet Corp. Retirement Account (collectively, “Defendants” or “D & B”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
BACKGROUND
This case arises out of disputes over a retirement plan for Dun & Bradstreet employees. According to the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff Jack Finley (“Finley”) has been employed by D &…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Amara v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Drutis v. Rand McNally & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Drutis v. Rand McNally & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007