Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Mark Ford v. New York State Racing and Wagering Board
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 19, 2014No. 225PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Lippman.
State agencies legislatively charged with regulating and supervising pari-mutuel horse racing have for decades taken measures to prevent horses from racing under the influence of drugs administered solely to boost equine speed beyond an animal’s natural capability. Prominent among these has been race day sampling of the blood and/or urine of competing horses to test for the presence of prohibited doping agents, a practice specifically authorized by respondent’s enabling legislation (Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law § 301 [2] [a]).
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- New York State Ass'n of Counties v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rent Stabilization Ass'n of New York City, Inc. v. HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Kuppersmith v. DowlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of B.Z. Chiropractic, P.C. v. Allstate Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Bouchard v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Matter of Parents for Educ. & Religious Liberty in Schs. v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 2025
- Matter of Cavetti v. ProudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of Parents for Educ. & Religious Liberty in Schs. v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.