Legal Opinion

Sharp v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1928No. 8 Div. 703PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The prosecution against this appellant appears to have been instituted under the provisions of a local act, approved February 11, 1919 (Local Acts 1919, p. 17), by affidavit of one S. B. Worley, made before.the clerk of the circuit court of Madison county; the warrant being made returnable before the judge of the circuit court of said county. The charge was a violation of the prohibition laws, and contained several alternative averments..The affidavit, as framed, was defective and subject to demurrer. Griffin v. State (Ala. App.) 115 So. 769; 1 but the demurrers interposed thereto. by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gerrish v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Daniel v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Griffin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Tweedy v. JarvisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  5. Grant v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gilbreath v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Sharp v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Abernathy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Green v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API