Sharp v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.
The prosecution against this appellant appears to have been instituted under the provisions of a local act, approved February 11, 1919 (Local Acts 1919, p. 17), by affidavit of one S. B. Worley, made before.the clerk of the circuit court of Madison county; the warrant being made returnable before the judge of the circuit court of said county. The charge was a violation of the prohibition laws, and contained several alternative averments..The affidavit, as framed, was defective and subject to demurrer. Griffin v. State (Ala. App.) 115 So. 769; 1 but the demurrers interposed thereto. by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gerrish v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Daniel v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Griffin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
- Tweedy v. JarvisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
- Grant v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gilbreath v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Sharp v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Abernathy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
- Green v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.