Legal Opinion

Green v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1930No. 7 Div. 618PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

Under the decision in the Jinright' Case 220 Ala. 268,125 So. 606, the complaint in this case is sufficient and not subject to demurrer. Prior to the Jinright decision, it was not considered a violation of law to buy prohibited liquors, and an alternative averment in an indictment charging- that defendant “did buy” was subject to demurrer. May’s Case, 89 Ala. 37, 8 So. 28; Hornsby’s Case, 94 Ala. 55, 10 So. 522; Griffin’s Case, 22 Ala. App. 369, 115 So. 769; Sharp’s Case, 22 Ala. App. 562, 118 So. 238; Sharp v. State, 218 Ala. 168, 118 So. 239. These cases and perhaps others are now overruled…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hornsby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Jinright v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Griffin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Sharp v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API