Legal Opinion
Moore v. Local 569 of Intern. Broth. of Elec. Workers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1995No. 94-55120PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
53 F.3d 339
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Lawrence MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LOCAL 569 OF the INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL
WORKERS; Paul Blackwood; Wayne Lovin; Jim Westfall; Tom
Pridemore; Joe Heisler; Dick Smith; International
Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 94-55120.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Venegas v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Kruger v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Cornwell Quality Tools Co. v. C. T. S. Company, Inc., Cornwell Quality Tools Co. v. C. T. S. Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Venegas v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moore v. BrewsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7080, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,624 Lawrence Moore v. Rudi M. Brewster Kathy Lowe Don Hendrix Lewis Levy Levy, Goldman & Levy, Inc. Steven Sayler Hillyer & Irwin, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996