Freeman v. Fehr
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for Eenville county. Plaintiff’s motion for an order restraining defendants from serving upon plaintiff pendente lite a notice of cancelation of tbe contract of sale mentioned in tbe complaint under section 8081, G-. S. 1913, was granted, Paly, J. From tbe order granting tbe restraining order, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
Appeal by defendants from an order of tbe district court of Eenville county restraining them pending tbe action from serving on plaintiff a notice of tbe cancelation under G. S. 1913, § 8081, of the contract of sale hereafter described, or in any other manner canceling tbe same.
The order appealed from was based upon tbe complaint and answer and upon affidavits. The complaint alleges that plaintiff and defendants on July 30, 1914, entered into a contract for the sale by tbe latter to tbe former of a farm in Eenville county for tbe price of $17,664.40; $8,300 of this was in mortgages against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Fridley v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Marshall v. GilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- International Realty & Securities Corp. v. VanderpoelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Clark v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- First National Bank v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Gridley v. RossIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Lawrence Zirinsky v. James L. Sheehan, John D. Sheehan and Brooklyn Center Industrial Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- West v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.