Legal Opinion
Lundstrom, Jr. v. Homolka, P.A.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided April 16, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01006Unknown
1Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT APR 16 2020 DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA Inthe Bhd. NORTHERN DIVISION LOWELL LUNDSTROMJR., 1:19-CV-01006-CBK Plaintiff, VS. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND DANIEL M. HOMOLKA P.A., DANIEL M. ORDER HOMOLKA, WATTS GUERRA LLP, MIKAL C, WATTS, Defendants. This matter is before the Court on the motion to dismiss counts two, three, and four of plaintiffs complaint, as well as the request for punitive damages, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Doc. 21, filed by defendants Mikal C. Watts and Watts Guerra…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.