Legal Opinion

Croft v. Bunster

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1859PublishedCited by 33 opinions

APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT, ROCK COUNTY. The facts in this case are fully stated in the opinion of the Chief Justice.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Oowrt

Dixon, C. J.

The facts in this case, as gathered from the pleadings and proofs, are these: The defendant, A. Hyatt Smith, being a co-partner in business with one Henry 0. Clark, and one Ira Justin, Jr, under the style and firm of H. 0. Clark & Co., and said firm being in embarrassed circumstances, in order to enable them to settle their affairs, on the 22d day of April, 1854, executed, acknowledged and delivered to Clark, a general power of attorney, authorizing him to collect all demands due to him, Smith, from any person or persons, to pay all his just debts, to sell and dispose…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. James v. MoreyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1823

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. W. W. Kimball Co. v. MellonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Lewis v. KirkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Sturgis National Bank v. Harris Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Tidioute Savings Bank v. LibbeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API