Legal Opinion

United States v. Gary Lee Spires

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 26, 1993No. 92-50126PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Gary Spires appeals the district court’s denial of his motions to suppress evidence and disclose the identity of the government’s confidential informant. Because the district court erred in not holding an in camera hearing on the disclosure motion, we reverse that denial and direct that such a hearing be held. We also remand to permit Spires to withdraw his plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2).

I. Facts and Proceedings

In mid March 1990, a confidential informant contacted a Corona (California) Police Department detective and stated that Gary Lee Spires and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. JohnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Remigio CHAN-JIMENEZ, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Darren Eugene HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Daniel James FowlieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Lawrence Ezekiel Reid, United States of America v. Wayne BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Jose Abonce-BarreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API